Thursday, June 18, 2026

World Cup 2026 – Matchday 1: The Good, The Bad, and The "Wait, What?"


The first round of group matches is in the books.

It's only been 7 days, but already feel like I suffer football overdose. Yet, we're merely getting warmed up!

One thing became immediately obvious: despite all the handwringing about expanding the tournament to 48 teams, Matchday 1 was anything but boring. Sure, there were a few games that felt like they should have come with a complimentary pillow, but there were also enough surprises, near-upsets, and genuine quality matches to keep things interesting.

And yes, before anyone asks...

I attended Spain vs. Cape Verde live in Atlanta.

So much for my declaration that FIFA wouldn't see another dime from me after the ticket-pricing fiasco. Apparently my principles, much like England's defense, have vulnerabilities when subjected to sufficient pressure. Clearly I have the same level of resistance to World Cup football as a moth has to a porch light.

Let's go group by group.

Group A – Mexico Makes a Statement

Mexico 2-0 South Africa
South Korea 2-1 Czechia

Mexico looked exactly like a host nation should look: organized, confident, and fully aware that the home crowd is willing to carry them the extra ten yards when their legs start getting heavy. Just three points and a nation's blood pressure temporarily returning to normal.

South Korea quietly produced one of the more impressive performances of Matchday 1. Their win over Czechia wasn't flashy, but it was efficient.

Group A may not contain a traditional heavyweight, but after one match it suddenly feels a lot more competitive than many expected. Mexico and South Korea already look like the teams to beat.

Group B – Nobody Wants to Leave

Canada 1-1 Bosnia & Herzegovina
Switzerland 1-1 Qatar

Four teams.

Four points total.

Four goals.

Four draws would somehow have felt more appropriate.

The opening matches in Group B produced enough parity to make an accountant smile. Nobody separated themselves, nobody embarrassed themselves, and nobody gave us much clue about who advances.

The biggest story may have been Qatar earning the first World Cup point in its history thanks to a stoppage-time equalizer after being outshot 26-7. It was entirely Switzerland's fault for not killing the game as they should

Football occasionally resembles a meritocracy.

This was not one of those occasions.

This group currently feels like one giant game of rock-paper-scissors.

Group C – Scotland, Meet World Cup Reality

Brazil 1-1 Morocco
Scotland 1-0 Haiti

Morocco picked up right where they left off in Qatar four years ago. Their draw with Brazil wasn't a fluke. They defended well, remained dangerous in transition, and looked completely comfortable on the big stage.

That's not necessarily a criticism. Tournament football isn't about winning beauty contests. It's about surviving.

Brazil looked decent without looking dominant. It's been a loooong time since Brazil have actually been considered "favorites". Years ago the talent heading from Brazil to Europe resembled a flood. these days, it's merely a "trickle". Brazil is simply not producing quality players any more... Just "above average".

Meanwhile Scotland won a World Cup match and immediately entered the "could we actually win this thing?" phase of the emotional cycle.

The answer is probably no.

But let them have this.

Group D – The Americans Arrive

United States 4-1 Paraguay
Australia 2-0 Turkey

The United States delivered one of the most convincing performances of Matchday 1. Four goals, attacking intent, and enough energy to make every neutral observer start recalculating expectations.

Were Paraguay poor?

Yes.

Did the U.S. still look excellent?

Also yes.

Australia's victory over Turkey may not have generated headlines, but it was one of the most professional performances of the tournament so far. The fact that Turkey thought they won before the game even started didn't help their cause.

Group D suddenly looks much stronger than expected.

Group E – Germany Doing Germany Things

Germany 7-1 Curaçao
Ivory Coast 1-0 Ecuador

Seven.

That's all.

Germany scored seven goals and reminded everyone that when they smell weakness, they tend to treat football matches like laboratory experiments.

The scary part?

They never looked particularly emotional about it.

Just efficient.

Just German.

Ivory Coast quietly grabbed one of the most important wins of Matchday 1. In a group where Germany already appears destined to finish first, every point matters. The fact that they waited until the very last minute to achieve it is pointless (but does not save from an otherwise boring game.

Group F – The Most Entertaining Draw

Netherlands 2-2 Japan
Sweden 5-1 Tunisia

If you only watched one Matchday 1 game, Netherlands-Japan had a strong case.

End-to-end football. Momentum swings. Chances. Drama.

The Dutch probably leave frustrated. As the Swiss the other day, they failed to killed the game when they needed to, and got punished for it.

Japan probably leaves encouraged.

Neutral fans leave happy.

Sweden, meanwhile, delivered the biggest surprise performance of the opening round. Five goals against Tunisia was not on many prediction sheets.

Somebody in Stockholm is already browsing airfare for the knockout rounds.

Group G – The Group of Shrugs

Belgium 1-1 Egypt
Iran 2-2 New Zealand

Raise your hand if you had New Zealand scoring twice against Iran.

Exactly.

Belgium only have themselves to blame.

Group G immediately became one of the hardest groups to predict. Every team remains alive, and nobody appears particularly eager to establish themselves as favorites.

Sometimes chaos is fun.

This is one of those times.

Group H – The Group I Saw Live


Spain 0-0 Cape Verde
Saudi Arabia 1-1 Uruguay

I was there in Atlanta. Yes, after writing an entire blog post explaining why FIFA wasn't getting another dollar from me. Clearly my boycott lasted roughly as long as a New Year's gym membership.

The atmosphere was outstanding.

The football?

Let's just say nobody will be producing a Netflix documentary about the match.

Spain dominated possession, territory, and most statistical categories. But lots of sideways and backwards passing. No real threat. No incisiveness. They were predictable. Slow. Uninspired. Cape Verde defended bravely, worked relentlessly, and fully deserved the point.

The bigger issue for Spain is one that has haunted them for years: they don't have a true No. 9.

Every attack felt like watching someone spend twenty minutes assembling IKEA furniture only to discover three screws are missing.

Lots of effort.

No finished product.

Meanwhile Cape Verde arrived with a very clear tactical plan:

Defend.

Defend some more.

Then defend the defending.

And you know what?

It worked.

The 0-0 draw felt like a victory for Cape Verde, a loss for Spain, and a punishment for neutral spectators.

Elsewhere, Saudi Arabia continued its recent tradition of refusing to follow anyone else's script. Their draw against Uruguay means Group H suddenly became one of the most fascinating groups in the tournament.

Group I – Norway Announces Itself

France 3-1 Senegal
Norway 4-1 Iraq

France won.

Nobody is surprised.

France always feels like they're operating at about 75% effort until suddenly they're in a semifinal.

But Norway's performance may have been more impressive.

Four goals. Clinical finishing. Confidence. Energy. Explains how they blew away Italy in the preliminaries. 

For years we've wondered whether Norway's talented generation could finally deliver on the biggest stage.

Early signs suggest the answer might be yes. 

Group J – The Messi Retirement Tour Continues

Argentina 3-0 Algeria
Austria 3-1 Jordan

Argentina looked exactly like defending champions should look.

Controlled.

Patient.

Dangerous.

The scary thing is they rarely seem rushed.

They simply wait for opponents to make mistakes and then punish them. Messi scored a hat-trick without even trying.

The defending champions didn't just win.

They looked like they knew exactly how this tournament works.

Which, to be fair, they do.

Austria also handled Jordan comfortably, creating a likely winner-take-all showdown with Argentina later in the group.

Group K – The Shock Group

Portugal 1-1 DR Congo
Uzbekistan 1-3 Colombia

Portugal's draw with DR Congo immediately became one of the biggest surprises of Matchday 1. DR Congo defended courageously, Portugal lacked sharpness, and suddenly a group many expected to be straightforward feels anything but. 

Frankly, this one is Roberto Martinez (Portugal coach). He stuck with a clearly "past-his-expiration-date" Ronaldo for the whole 90, while having so many better options on the bench. I know they all want him to break yet another scoring record, but football is a team sport, not about individual accolades. I'm sure they will bounce back, but a tie with DR Congo does not bode well for all the talent in that squad

Every World Cup produces at least one group where pre-tournament predictions get shredded before the second round begins.

Group K is volunteering.

Late last night Colombia also sweated until the last minute against Uzbekistan. You can tell they are coached by a World Cup Italian defender!

Group L – The Best Match So Far

England 4-2 Croatia
Ghana 1-0 Panama

England and Croatia produced the game of the tournament.

Six goals.

Momentum swings.

Defensive mistakes.

Individual brilliance.

Complete chaos.

At one point it looked like neither side had much interest in defending. England ultimately prevailed thanks to Harry Kane, Jude Bellingham, and an attack that looked frightening whenever it accelerated. 

The bad news for England?

They still conceded twice and occasionally defended like they had only recently met each other. 

The good news?

Most teams would gladly accept that trade-off.

Meanwhile Ghana quietly collected three valuable points against Panama and may have positioned themselves perfectly to become one of the tournament's surprise stories.

Final Thoughts


The first round delivered exactly what a World Cup should deliver.

A few giants stumbled.

A few underdogs believed.

A few favorites reminded us why they're favorites.

And one stubborn blogger who swore FIFA would never get another dollar out of him somehow ended up sitting in Atlanta watching Spain pass the ball sideways for ninety minutes.

The World Cup is back.

And somehow, despite everything, it's still magic.

Ready for Round 2!

Wednesday, June 10, 2026

World Cup 2026 - My Predictions

 The Beautiful Game Gets An Ugly Price Tag

As much as I’m looking forward to the World Cup (and even catching a game or two live) FIFA is doing a remarkably efficient job of sucking the joy out of it. Not just for me, but for millions of fans worldwide. Paradoxically, there’s something almost poetic about it, not in a good way: the same organization that spent decades growing the global game now seems intent on pricing it out of reach. Slowly. Methodically. And with zero remorse. The “beautiful game,” rebranded as a luxury product.

Let me put the price escalation in perspective. The first World Cup I had attended - back in 1994 - really was a tournament “for the fans”. At the time, I paid $75 for a Category 1 ticket (proof below). That’s $167 in 2026 dollars, adjusted for inflation and cost of living. The last one I experienced live (2014 in Brazil) saw prices creep up, but they still felt tethered to reality. The same category was $175 ($244 in today’s dollars) for a top-tier game between Chile (South American champion at the time) and Spain (reigning Euro champion). I was lucky enough to get a ticket to the final (which I ended up exchanging for several group-stage games). The price for a Category 2 FINAL ticket: $660 ($920 today). Expensive, sure. But still within reach for actual fans, not just corporations and hedge funds.


Today, the same type of group-game ticket for an obscure game like Congo vs. Uzbekistan is $450 for Category 2. Twice that for Cat 1. Come on! No disrespect for either country, but…. NO! The average ticket for group-stage Cat 1 across all stadiums is $620!! Yet, some games - like USA-Paraguay - are listed at $2,000 for a Cat 2 ticket (which really should be Cat 3, since it’s waaay up on the rafters; bring binoculars). A Cat 1 ticket to Spain - Saudi Arabia (albeit in a corner) is $1,500 on their portal. Official price, not resale. Straight from FIFA, delivered with a straight face. I would have really loved to watch Spain live, but NOT for that kind of money. No thank you!


Oh, and on top of it, FIFA also has a resale option on the ticketing portal, where they charge BOTH the seller and the buyer a 15% (each) “convenience” fee to facilitate that transfer. I’m wondering who is that convenient for? Clearly not the buyer. Or the seller… wink, wink…

The buzzword FIFA hides behind is dynamic pricing; a concept they conveniently introduced for this tournament to squeeze every last dollar out of demand they themselves manufactured. What they won't tell you is that matchday revenues are projected to hit $3 billion in 2026 (a jaw-dropping 216% increase over Qatar 2022, which itself generated $950 million). The overall tournament is expected to rake in nearly $11 billion (up 56% from 2022). TV rights alone account for over $4.2 billion. FIFA, by the way, is a nonprofit. Sleep well.

And if you thought that was steep, the “hospitality” packages are where things really go off the rails: $3,000 to $8,000 (group games) for the privilege of saying you didn’t just attend, you networked. As for the final, a “regular” Category 1 ticket now runs anywhere from $6,700 to $10,000. At that point, you’re not buying a seat. You’re making a financial decision that probably deserves its own spreadsheet (and a small bank loan).

Unsurprisingly, real fans are not thrilled. There’s been no shortage of criticism and outrage. FIFA’s response appears to be a collective shrug. Why would they care? They’re hosting in the United States, where eye-watering ticket prices are practically a cultural norm, and where a decent chunk of the audience is perfectly happy to pay a premium for the social media proof of attendance. The result is predictable: the World Cup, once the ultimate global fan festival, is starting to feel more like a corporate showcase with a football match attached.

Fan groups and consumer rights organizations in Europe have filed formal complaints accusing FIFA of exploiting its monopoly to impose excessive prices and unfair purchasing conditions. I’m not even going to comment on their ticket-purchasing protocols. Gianni Infantino's response? He compared World Cup tickets to NFL games and concert tickets, and suggested people don't usually complain about those prices. Remarkable. 

Meanwhile, New Jersey's governor pointed out that FIFA is pocketing $11 billion while contributing exactly $0 toward the $48 million transit bill NJ TRANSIT is left holding. In response (and an equally greedy stance, since regular price is under $15) they plan to charge $150 for a round trip ticket from Penn Station in Manhattan to MetLife Stadium. FIFA's reaction: the price hike will impact attendance and affect the experience. LOL!  So THAT will have an impact, but not the exorbitant ticket prices. That’s just precious!!! And blatantly hypocritical. 

Bottom line, everyone - and I mean everyone - is trying to price-gouge anything related to this tournament. It’s not just the tickets. Fans are staring down flights and accommodations that will likely cost two to three times their usual rates. Add it all up, and for many, the math simply doesn’t work. The atmosphere, that electric mix of fans cramming into the same pub, the same subway car, the real magic of a World Cup, that collision of cultures and accents and flags and chants, will take a huge hit. Fewer traveling fans, fewer stories in the stands. More empty seats in the early rounds. A vast majority of the fans will stay home and watch it on TV. FIFA, of course, will be just fine. Their real money comes from broadcasting rights and sponsorships anyway.

FIFA is hiding all this greed behind the veil of supply vs demand, dynamic pricing (I mentioned that already) and a statement that a portion of the proceeds will be diverted back to the individual federations. Let’s be real. We all know that any money most federations receive will be pocketed by the equally corrupt leadership of the respective federations, with a few balls and training bibs distributed to their grassroots movement, just to “keep them quiet”. We’ve seen this film before. Of course, “real” journalists won’t write about that. 


Regardless, once the tournament kicks off, fans will still enjoy it. Most, watching it on TV. Despite what FIFA tells you, a lot of the early stage games will have limited attendance. With the World Cup expanded to 48 teams, countries like Curaçao or Jordan won’t be of major interest to most. As usual, the “real” World Cup won’t start until we whittle it down to 16 teams. That’s when things will get serious, and that’s when I will likely start paying more attention (most games being played during daytime won’t help)


With all that off my chest, let’s go through my predictions. The actual football:


I don’t see many surprises in the group stages. With top 2 teams from each of the 12 groups, and another 8 best-placed 3rd place going through, the round of 32 will be very predictable also. As with any World Cup, there will be a surprise or two, but typically those “surprise” teams won’t have the stamina (and squad depth) to go too much further. Don’t get too attached.


Round of 16 will present some interesting duels. France - Germany will be one (slight edge to Les Bleus) and Brazil - Norway. Yes, Norway. They have been red-hot during the qualifiers, while Brazil continue their identity crisis. Who will go through this stage: France, Netherlands, Spain, Turkey, Norway, England, Argentina and Portugal.


Quarterfinals will pit France against Netherlands (the Dutch will exit). Spain against Turkey (no question there), Norway against England (slight edge to England) and Argentina against Portugal (the Lusitans having the better squad, in my opinion, versus an aging Albiceleste). Messi’s last game for Argentina, unfortunately…


That will call for an England - Portugal semifinal on one end (Portugal to go through) and a France - Spain on the other end. As much as I think France has a better forward line, I think Spain has a stronger midfield and would ultimately prevail. That kind of game will be won in the middle of the park. Spain just has that rhythm, that control, that ability to suffocate games without you quite noticing until it’s too late. I could be wrong (and hope I am not). It will also depend on any potential injuries on the way to the semifinal (France has more depth in their squad). Call it analysis, call it bias, call it stubborn romanticism. Ultimately, that game could go either way, and would be the unofficial final in my book. 


Spain to win it all in the end, because I’m still a hopeless romantic and think that they play the most beautiful football at the moment. But it will be a long tournament. Injuries, suspensions, and freak surprises will undoubtedly happen. Something will go sideways somewhere.

Despite all of the above, the pricing, the posturing, the slow drift away from the fans, I’ll still watch. Of course I will. Just not from the stands. From my couch, like 99% of the world. On a big screen. Where the beer is affordable, the view is perfect, and FIFA doesn’t get another dime from me.

And maybe that’s the real story of this World Cup: record revenues, record prices… and record numbers of actual fans watching from everywhere but the stadium. Turns out the “beautiful game” is still beautiful. You just need a TV subscription to see it.

Sunday, February 11, 2024

Patagonia & Beyond (9 of 9) - Half day in Bogotá


As if this trip wasn’t long enough, or didn’t have enough stops, we decided to take advantage of a long layover in Bogotá and go visit. Ok…ok…you got me…the layover was short, but we noticed another connection to Atlanta later in the afternoon, so we did it on purpose!  Booked a 6-hour private guide to “catch” a quick glimpse of the city.

With a 5 am landing, there was no amount of coffee that could keep us awake, but once David arrived, and we walked into the brisk morning air, the antennas were up! The guide startled us at first. Full of tattoos (the knuckles indicating gang affiliation) and body jewelry, didn’t fit expectations. But he spoke very good English, was personable, knowledgeable, and clearly loved his city. We stopped first at Monserrate Sanctuary – a church and pilgrimage site at 10,000 feet above sea level, which happened to be very busy that day; major Catholic holiday. Nice panoramic view of the sprawling city from up there, with the omnipresent Andes – again – far in the distance. Much larger than Santiago (it’s actually 5th biggest in South America; if you’re wondering, São Paulo, Buenos Aires, Rio de Janeiro and Lima are the top four) but significantly impacted by poverty and a tumultuous past. Not really a major tourist attraction (visitors prefer Cartagena and Barranquilla, on the coast, Medellin, or Cali, the salsa capital of Colombia), the city still has plenty to offer, if you know where to look, or go with a guide.

From there, we visited the colorful old town, where walls are adorned by beautiful murals and artistic graffiti, and the Botero museum (renowned local artist known for his unique style), just to stay with the arts theme...


Around the corner, Plaza de Bolívar, where the Primada Cathedral, Palace of Justice, the presidential palace, are located. Remember the siege in Narcos, where the guerillas took over and destroyed all the evidence against Escobar? Yeah, that Palace of Justice! 

After a bit more haggling over souvenir prices in the plaza, time for a quick bite before heading back to the airport. We always enjoy trying the local foods, so at David’s suggestion we stopped by Mama Lupe, an unassuming hole-in-the-wall to try the Ajiaco, a unique Colombian dish, especially beloved in Bogota. It's a hearty chicken soup made with potatoes and corn on the cob (the secret ingredient: papas criollas, a small yellow Andean potato that “dissolves” and thickens the soup as it cooks. Their beef sancocho (somewhere between a stew and a soup) and tamales were out-of-this world comfort food. Andrew Zimmern would be jealous…

Bellies full, we headed back to the airport for the last leg of the trip back to the States. Thankful for the opportunity to witness all these wonders. Grateful that we were all [still] in one piece. Re-playing everything behind tired, closed eyelids. Happy that it all went down without a hitch. Vouching to return soon, for there are other parts of South America to explore, where the people are warm and friendly, the nature is sooo breathtaking, the food, simply amazing, and the dollar stretches much further.

¡Hasta la próxima, amigos!


Quick jumps to all the other legs of this trip:







Patagonia & Beyond (8 of 9) - Santiago de Chile

Santiago was not initially on the itinerary (round trip flights to/from the same location tend to be cheaper) but as we “looked” across the Andes, and realized it was “inches” away (less than an hour’s flight from Mendoza) then it became a no-brainer.

This sprawling metropolis, right at the foot of the Andes, is 6th biggest in South America (about 7 million) and accounts for over 40% of Chile’s population. It’s huge, blending both classical/colonial architecture (city was founded in the early 1,500’s) as well as modern (Costanera area is known as the Wall Street of South America). As any big city, it has its fair share of “shady” areas and barrios where drug trafficking thrives, but overall, it is safe, and somewhat tourist friendly.

For convenience, we booked a two-day hop-on-hop-off tour, but taxis and Uber are plentiful. The latter is not (yet) legal, but omnipresent. Reminds me of the early days in NY, where Yellow Cab taxis were trying to stifle the inevitable proliferation of ride-share options. Can’t stop progress.

When pressed for time, I appreciate the “visitor” double decker buses, as they provide the narrative along the itinerary, and the convenience of stopping on the way. First halt, Cerro San Cristobal and the cable car ride for panoramic views of the city below. Unfortunately, summer days tend to be hot and hazy, which combined with pollution make the mountains in the distance barely visible. We passed through the park, although one can spend an entire day visiting the Japanese Gardens, Botanical Gardens, or the Zoo. 

We took the funicular down, from the other end of the hill, and walked through Patronato – a more “colorful” part of town, on the way to the Central Market. Word to the wise: this is a part of town where one shouldn’t venture alone, display opulence, and keep an eye on the purse or the phone. We were even alerted to that by one of the locals, that clearly recognized we were out of place, sticking out like sore thumbs. But we’re Romanians; we’ve certainly been through worse…


The Central Market was a disappointment. I envisioned something similar to the markets in other bigger cities, but this one felt “tired”, dirty and unkept, with uninviting odors of dead fish and rotten fruits wafting from all corners. Sure, the fish stalls were well stocked, with a large variety of fish, but beyond that, there were maybe a couple fruit and vegetable stalls, and that’s it. The rest of the market… aggressive “hosts” inviting you to dine into their “restaurants” (quotes used on purpose). Couldn’t get out of there fast enough…

The remaining few blocks to Plaza de Armas and the Metropolitan Cathedral are littered with all kinds of shops, most of them heavily guarded. Makes tourists feel safe, but there must be a reason for their presence (there have been increasing reports about safety, crime, and civil unrest, both here and especially in Valparaiso).  The Cathedral – over 200 years old – is an imposing edifice and worth a quick visit. Get up to the bell towers if you have time.

We strolled through the area and eventually got out of the heat to enjoy some pisco sours at Chipe Libre. Other notable watering holes or lunch options in the area: Liguria (especially for the 3-story tall bar and the old-school service!), Bocanariz, Salvador Cocina y Café, or, near Costanera, Ambrosia Bistro, Fuente Alemana, or Tacu Tacu (this last one, an amazing ceviche place we gorged the night before; the Nikkei ceviche, a huge hit!).

"Blessed pisco
Sweet torment
Why are you outside?
Come on in!"


...small world (found Bucharest street in Santiago)

Since we’re talking food, there are so, so many good options in Santiago (https://www.theworlds50best.com/discovery/sitemap/chile/santiago). The Pacific is an hour away, meaning seafood is top notch.  Borago has been one of the best in the world for years; a pioneer in sustainability (reservations are tough to get).  Ambrosia is an up and comer (the Bistro is their more affordable option). We opted for Peumayén Ancestral Food, mostly because it advertised “traditional Chilean food using indigenous ingredients and techniques. It was hit and miss. Appetizers and small bites were good, some quite interesting, but the main dishes fell a bit short. Interesting, overall, but if you only have a day or two in the city, there are better options. 

One of those is La Mar. Another “cebiceria” where ingredients are so fresh, and the “leche de tigre” so delicious, that my mouth is watering as I write this. It was – by far – the best ceviche I ever had in my life. If you can’t make it to Santiago, they have locations in Miami and San Francisco as well.  


Day two, we took the double-decker to Plaza de La Constitución and Palacio de la Moneda (Presidential offices). Imposing Christmas tree right up front. Twenty-foot Nutcrackers. But not easy to get into the holiday spirit when it’s 90 degrees outside…

From there, off to Santa Lucía park – a smaller hill with a picturesque, manicured park featuring terraces, fountains, and old castle, and a summit viewpoint.  

There is a Craft Fair across the street, but we preferred the shaded option of the aforementioned Liguria bar, cooling off with another round of pisco sours (so refreshing on a hot summer day). Behind an unassuming entrance, the bar/restaurant it’s an absolute delight on 3 levels, each with a very unique character. Worth a stop, for the ambiance and service alone!

Before dinner, and for last minute souvenirs, we stopped at Costanera Mall. A behemoth on 6 levels (at least) so busy, in contrast to most malls in the States. Clearly Amazon, and online shopping in general are still to make an impact in Santiago… For kids, active adults, or just another reprieve from the sun, Mall Sport is a huge venue with every imaginable activity, from wall climbing, to indoor surfing, to bumper cars and everything in between. Worth a detour if travelling with teens.


Later on, last packing of the trip and off to the airport for a late (12:05 am late) flight to Bogotá.  Kudos to the nice folks at AC Marriott for outstanding service and going the extra mile to accommodate us in every way! The outdoor bar, with a fantastic panorama of the city, is not too shabby either. And if you’re into all that, the Sky Costanera next door is the highest viewpoint in South America (300 meters); for about $18 it might be worth it, but only if the visibility is good. In our case, the hotel room offered just as much…


Next: a quick layover in Bogotá, before heading home: https://disdatdudder.blogspot.com/2024/02/patagonia-beyond-9-of-9-half-day-in.html

Quick jumps to all the other legs of this trip: